Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga
Google Play
$278.7K/mo
~$3.34M/yr · 3.4M installs
VS
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Liviet
Google Play
$31.8K/mo
~$381.7K/yr · 290K installs
Revenue winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+776% vs other
Installs winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+1063% vs other
MAU winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+768% vs other
Rating winner
InterFasting - Fasting Timer wins
+1% vs other
Why Calz: Calorie Counter AI is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns roughly 9× more per month than InterFasting - Fasting Timer - $278.7K vs $31.8K.
- Premium pricing. Calz: Calorie Counter AI charges $15.45/mo vs InterFasting - Fasting Timer's $6.92/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Calz: Calorie Counter AI has ~3.4M lifetime installs vs InterFasting - Fasting Timer's ~290K - 11.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calz: Calorie Counter AI report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
vs
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$278.7K
◀
$31.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.34M
◀
$381.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.4M
◀
290K
Monthly active users (est.)?
486K
◀
56K
App Store rating
4.60★
▶
4.64★
Total ratings
147K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$15.45
◀
$6.92
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.50.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 12, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 3.309
- Languages
- -
Calz: Calorie Counter AI trajectory
InterFasting - Fasting Timer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or InterFasting - Fasting Timer? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns about $278.7K per month, while InterFasting - Fasting Timer earns about $31.8K. That is a 8.8× revenue gap (~$246.9K more per month for Calz: Calorie Counter AI). Annual revenue: Calz: Calorie Counter AI ≈ $3.34M/year, InterFasting - Fasting Timer ≈ $381.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or InterFasting - Fasting Timer? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI leads with about 3.4M estimated downloads vs 290K for InterFasting - Fasting Timer - a 11.6× gap. Calz: Calorie Counter AI reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. InterFasting - Fasting Timer reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calz: Calorie Counter AI and InterFasting - Fasting Timer in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calz: Calorie Counter AI and InterFasting - Fasting Timer offer? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI: IAP range $1.99 - $119.99 per item. InterFasting - Fasting Timer: IAP range $3.99 - $11.99 per item. Calz: Calorie Counter AI runs a "Subscription (~$15.45/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; InterFasting - Fasting Timer runs "Subscription (~$6.92/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or InterFasting - Fasting Timer? v
InterFasting - Fasting Timer edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Calz: Calorie Counter AI 255 ratings, InterFasting - Fasting Timer 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs InterFasting - Fasting Timer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $278.7K for Calz: Calorie Counter AI and $31.8K for InterFasting - Fasting Timer are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calz: Calorie Counter AI or InterFasting - Fasting Timer to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.