Calz - Calorie Counter AI vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Calz - Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga LTD
App Store
$7.6K/mo
~$91.5K/yr · 91K installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 101.7M installs
Revenue winner
Calz - Calorie Counter AI wins
+762400% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+111689% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+27364% vs other
Rating winner
Calz - Calorie Counter AI wins
+4% vs other
Why Calz - Calorie Counter AI is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calz - Calorie Counter AI earns roughly 7624× more per month than Google Health (Fitbit) - $7.6K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Calz - Calorie Counter AI runs a $11.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Health (Fitbit) relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calz - Calorie Counter AI report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calz - Calorie Counter AI
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$7.6K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$91.5K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
91K
▶
101.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
26K
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.67★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
4K
▶
678K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 31, 2024
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 157.7 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.51.0
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech +41 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Calz - Calorie Counter AI trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calz - Calorie Counter AI earns about $7.6K per month, while Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$7.6K more per month for Calz - Calorie Counter AI). Annual revenue: Calz - Calorie Counter AI ≈ $91.5K/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.7M estimated downloads vs 91K for Calz - Calorie Counter AI - a 1117.9× gap. Calz - Calorie Counter AI's App Store downloads are estimated from 4K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 678K ratings.
Are Calz - Calorie Counter AI and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calz - Calorie Counter AI and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calz - Calorie Counter AI: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): no IAP detected on the public listing. Calz - Calorie Counter AI runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calz - Calorie Counter AI edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calz - Calorie Counter AI 4K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 678K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calz - Calorie Counter AI vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $7.6K for Calz - Calorie Counter AI and $0 for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.