Calz - Calorie Counter AI vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Calz - Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga LTD
App Store
$6.7K/mo
~$79.8K/yr · 79K installs
VS
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.51M/yr · 98.8M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+40625% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+124528% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+54667% vs other
Rating winner
Calz - Calorie Counter AI wins
+3% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 407× more per month than Calz - Calorie Counter AI - $2.71M vs $6.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.8M lifetime installs vs Calz - Calorie Counter AI's ~79K - 1246.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calz - Calorie Counter AI
vs
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$6.7K
▶
$2.71M
Annual revenue (est.)
$79.8K
▶
$32.51M
Lifetime installs (est.)
79K
▶
98.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
23K
▶
12.5M
App Store rating
4.68★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
3K
▶
659K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
=
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 31, 2024
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 155.6 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.42.0
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech +41 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
Calz - Calorie Counter AI trajectory
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Calz - Calorie Counter AI earns about $6.7K. That is a 407.3× revenue gap (~$2.70M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Calz - Calorie Counter AI ≈ $79.8K/year, Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.51M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.8M estimated downloads vs 79K for Calz - Calorie Counter AI - a 1246.3× gap. Calz - Calorie Counter AI's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 659K ratings.
Are Calz - Calorie Counter AI and Fitbit: Health & Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calz - Calorie Counter AI and Fitbit: Health & Fitness offer? v
Calz - Calorie Counter AI: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calz - Calorie Counter AI runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Calz - Calorie Counter AI edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calz - Calorie Counter AI 3K ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness 659K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calz - Calorie Counter AI vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $6.7K for Calz - Calorie Counter AI and $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calz - Calorie Counter AI or Fitbit: Health & Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.