Cape to Cape Track Guide vs MapChick's Isla Mujeres
Cape to Cape Track Guide
Find the Fun Pty Ltd
Google Play
$331/mo
~$4.0K/yr · 2K installs
VS
MapChick's Isla Mujeres
Perry & Laura McFarlin
Google Play
$296/mo
~$3.6K/yr · 12K installs
Revenue winner
Cape to Cape Track Guide wins
+12% vs other
Installs winner
MapChick's Isla Mujeres wins
+580% vs other
MAU winner
MapChick's Isla Mujeres wins
+588% vs other
Rating winner
MapChick's Isla Mujeres wins
+415% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cape to Cape Track Guide
vs
MapChick's Isla Mujeres
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$331
◀
$296
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.0K
◀
$3.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
12K
Monthly active users (est.)?
298.598
▶
2K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.15★
Total ratings
0
▶
34
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD15.99
- Released
- Feb 12, 2017
- Last updated
- Mar 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.0.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 10, 2021
- Last updated
- Feb 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.37
- Languages
- -
Cape to Cape Track Guide trajectory
MapChick's Isla Mujeres trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cape to Cape Track Guide or MapChick's Isla Mujeres? v
Cape to Cape Track Guide earns about $331 per month, while MapChick's Isla Mujeres earns about $296. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$35 more per month for Cape to Cape Track Guide). Annual revenue: Cape to Cape Track Guide ≈ $4.0K/year, MapChick's Isla Mujeres ≈ $3.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cape to Cape Track Guide or MapChick's Isla Mujeres? v
MapChick's Isla Mujeres leads with about 12K estimated downloads vs 2K for Cape to Cape Track Guide - a 6.8× gap. Cape to Cape Track Guide reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. MapChick's Isla Mujeres reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cape to Cape Track Guide and MapChick's Isla Mujeres in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cape to Cape Track Guide and MapChick's Isla Mujeres offer? v
Cape to Cape Track Guide: no IAP detected on the public listing. MapChick's Isla Mujeres: IAP range $14.99 per item. Cape to Cape Track Guide runs a "Paid app ($15.99)" monetization model; MapChick's Isla Mujeres runs "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cape to Cape Track Guide or MapChick's Isla Mujeres? v
MapChick's Isla Mujeres edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.2 stars). Rating volume: Cape to Cape Track Guide 0 ratings, MapChick's Isla Mujeres 19 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cape to Cape Track Guide vs MapChick's Isla Mujeres revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $331 for Cape to Cape Track Guide and $296 for MapChick's Isla Mujeres are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cape to Cape Track Guide or MapChick's Isla Mujeres to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.