Capriccio vs Koala Sampler
Capriccio
Sal Balah
Google Play
$81.5K/mo
~$977.7K/yr · 1.4M installs
VS
Koala Sampler
elf audio
Google Play
$8.1K/mo
~$97.4K/yr · 136K installs
Revenue winner
Capriccio wins
+904% vs other
Installs winner
Capriccio wins
+910% vs other
MAU winner
Capriccio wins
+562% vs other
Rating winner
Koala Sampler wins
+5% vs other
Why Capriccio is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Capriccio earns roughly 10× more per month than Koala Sampler - $81.5K vs $8.1K.
- Premium pricing. Capriccio charges $10.25/mo vs Koala Sampler's $3.86/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Capriccio has ~1.4M lifetime installs vs Koala Sampler's ~136K - 10.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Capriccio report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Capriccio
vs
Koala Sampler
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$81.5K
◀
$8.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$977.7K
◀
$97.4K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.4M
◀
136K
Monthly active users (est.)?
292K
◀
44K
App Store rating
4.67★
▶
4.88★
Total ratings
9K
◀
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.25
◀
$3.86
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 29, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 6.5.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Mar 26, 2020
- Last updated
- Mar 13, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.4154
- Languages
- -
Capriccio trajectory
Koala Sampler trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Capriccio or Koala Sampler? v
Capriccio earns about $81.5K per month, while Koala Sampler earns about $8.1K. That is a 10.0× revenue gap (~$73.4K more per month for Capriccio). Annual revenue: Capriccio ≈ $977.7K/year, Koala Sampler ≈ $97.4K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Capriccio or Koala Sampler? v
Capriccio leads with about 1.4M estimated downloads vs 136K for Koala Sampler - a 10.1× gap. Capriccio reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Koala Sampler reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Capriccio and Koala Sampler in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Music & Audio category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Capriccio and Koala Sampler offer? v
Capriccio: IAP range $3.50 - $29.99 per item. Koala Sampler: IAP range $2.99 - $4.99 per item. Capriccio runs a "Subscription (~$10.25/mo)" monetization model; Koala Sampler runs "Paid app ($4.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Capriccio or Koala Sampler? v
Koala Sampler edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Capriccio 56 ratings, Koala Sampler 506 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Capriccio vs Koala Sampler revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $81.5K for Capriccio and $8.1K for Koala Sampler are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Music & Audio) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Capriccio or Koala Sampler to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.