Capriccio vs XME LOOPS
Capriccio
Sal Balah
Google Play
$75.2K/mo
~$902.3K/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
XME LOOPS
XME Inc.
Google Play
$8.7K/mo
~$104.6K/yr · 74K installs
Revenue winner
Capriccio wins
+762% vs other
Installs winner
Capriccio wins
+1604% vs other
MAU winner
Capriccio wins
+762% vs other
Rating winner
Capriccio wins
+4% vs other
Why Capriccio is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Capriccio earns roughly 9× more per month than XME LOOPS - $75.2K vs $8.7K.
- Premium pricing. Capriccio charges $11.83/mo vs XME LOOPS's $10.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Capriccio has ~1.3M lifetime installs vs XME LOOPS's ~74K - 17.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Capriccio report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Capriccio
vs
XME LOOPS
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75.2K
◀
$8.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$902.3K
◀
$104.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
◀
74K
Monthly active users (est.)?
269K
◀
31K
App Store rating
4.66★
◀
4.50★
Total ratings
8K
◀
954
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.83
◀
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 29, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 6.5.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 1, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.8
- Languages
- -
Capriccio trajectory
XME LOOPS trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Capriccio or XME LOOPS? v
Capriccio earns about $75.2K per month, while XME LOOPS earns about $8.7K. That is a 8.6× revenue gap (~$66.5K more per month for Capriccio). Annual revenue: Capriccio ≈ $902.3K/year, XME LOOPS ≈ $104.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Capriccio or XME LOOPS? v
Capriccio leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 74K for XME LOOPS - a 17.0× gap. Capriccio reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. XME LOOPS reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Capriccio and XME LOOPS in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Music & Audio category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Capriccio and XME LOOPS offer? v
Capriccio: IAP range $3.50 - $39.99 per item. XME LOOPS: IAP range $9.99 - $109.99 per item. Capriccio runs a "Subscription (~$11.83/mo)" monetization model; XME LOOPS runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Capriccio or XME LOOPS? v
Capriccio edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Capriccio 54 ratings, XME LOOPS 238 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Capriccio vs XME LOOPS revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75.2K for Capriccio and $8.7K for XME LOOPS are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Music & Audio) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Capriccio or XME LOOPS to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.