カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs FishEyeVideo Pro
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)
Devision
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 42K installs
VS
FishEyeVideo Pro
Bian Di
Google Play
$65/mo
~$776/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
FishEyeVideo Pro wins
+6500% vs other
Installs winner
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) wins
+1458% vs other
MAU winner
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) wins
+1816% vs other
Rating winner
FishEyeVideo Pro wins
+340% vs other
Why FishEyeVideo Pro is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- FishEyeVideo Pro earns roughly 65× more per month than カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - $65 vs $0.
- Better app store reviews. FishEyeVideo Pro sits at 3.40★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FishEyeVideo Pro report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$65
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$776
Lifetime installs (est.)
42K
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
13K
◀
660.508
App Store rating
-
▶
3.40★
Total ratings
0
▶
58
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Oct 31, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.0.4
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Jul 24, 2015
- Last updated
- Aug 26, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) trajectory
FishEyeVideo Pro trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or FishEyeVideo Pro? v
FishEyeVideo Pro earns about $65 per month, while カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$65 more per month for FishEyeVideo Pro). Annual revenue: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) ≈ $0/year, FishEyeVideo Pro ≈ $776/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or FishEyeVideo Pro? v
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) leads with about 42K estimated downloads vs 3K for FishEyeVideo Pro - a 15.6× gap. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. FishEyeVideo Pro reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and FishEyeVideo Pro in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and FishEyeVideo Pro have in-app purchases? v
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. FishEyeVideo Pro does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", FishEyeVideo Pro runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or FishEyeVideo Pro? v
FishEyeVideo Pro edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.4 stars). Rating volume: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) 0 ratings, FishEyeVideo Pro 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs FishEyeVideo Pro revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and $65 for FishEyeVideo Pro are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or FishEyeVideo Pro to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
