カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs Fomz
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)
Devision
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 42K installs
VS
Fomz
MagicDmStudio
Google Play
$1.03M/mo
~$12.33M/yr · 28.1M installs
Revenue winner
Fomz wins
+102720900% vs other
Installs winner
Fomz wins
+66643% vs other
MAU winner
Fomz wins
+20590% vs other
Rating winner
Fomz wins
+438% vs other
Why Fomz is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fomz earns roughly 1027209× more per month than カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - $1.03M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fomz runs a $4.46/mo subscription that compounds; カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Fomz has ~28.1M lifetime installs vs カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)'s ~42K - 667.4× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fomz sits at 4.38★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$1.03M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$12.33M
Lifetime installs (est.)
42K
▶
28.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
13K
▶
2.6M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.38★
Total ratings
0
▶
80K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$4.46
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Oct 31, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.0.4
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 5, 2022
- Last updated
- Nov 27, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.2.6
- Languages
- -
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) trajectory
Fomz trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Fomz? v
Fomz earns about $1.03M per month, while カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.03M more per month for Fomz). Annual revenue: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) ≈ $0/year, Fomz ≈ $12.33M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Fomz? v
Fomz leads with about 28.1M estimated downloads vs 42K for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - a 667.4× gap. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Fomz reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and Fomz in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and Fomz offer? v
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share): no IAP detected on the public listing. Fomz: IAP range $1.99 - $9.99 per item. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Fomz runs "Subscription (~$4.46/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Fomz? v
Fomz edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.4 stars). Rating volume: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) 0 ratings, Fomz 243 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs Fomz revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and $1.03M for Fomz are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Fomz to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
