カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs Tezza: Aesthetic Editor
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)
Devision
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 42K installs
VS
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor
Tezza
Google Play
$563.2K/mo
~$6.76M/yr · 9.8M installs
Revenue winner
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor wins
+56315800% vs other
Installs winner
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor wins
+23081% vs other
MAU winner
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor wins
+11181% vs other
Rating winner
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor wins
+365% vs other
Why Tezza: Aesthetic Editor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Tezza: Aesthetic Editor earns roughly 563158× more per month than カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - $563.2K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Tezza: Aesthetic Editor runs a $5.99/mo subscription that compounds; カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Tezza: Aesthetic Editor has ~9.8M lifetime installs vs カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)'s ~42K - 231.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Tezza: Aesthetic Editor sits at 3.65★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Tezza: Aesthetic Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$563.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$6.76M
Lifetime installs (est.)
42K
▶
9.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
13K
▶
1.4M
App Store rating
-
▶
3.65★
Total ratings
0
▶
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Oct 31, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.0.4
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 4, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.31.1
- Languages
- -
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) trajectory
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Tezza: Aesthetic Editor? v
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor earns about $563.2K per month, while カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$563.2K more per month for Tezza: Aesthetic Editor). Annual revenue: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) ≈ $0/year, Tezza: Aesthetic Editor ≈ $6.76M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Tezza: Aesthetic Editor? v
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor leads with about 9.8M estimated downloads vs 42K for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - a 231.8× gap. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Tezza: Aesthetic Editor reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and Tezza: Aesthetic Editor in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and Tezza: Aesthetic Editor offer? v
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share): no IAP detected on the public listing. Tezza: Aesthetic Editor: IAP range $3.99 - $39.99 per item. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Tezza: Aesthetic Editor runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Tezza: Aesthetic Editor? v
Tezza: Aesthetic Editor edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.6 stars). Rating volume: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) 0 ratings, Tezza: Aesthetic Editor 203 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs Tezza: Aesthetic Editor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and $563.2K for Tezza: Aesthetic Editor are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or Tezza: Aesthetic Editor to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
