カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo

カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)

Devision
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 42K installs
VS

TON: Filters for Video & Photo

Mobile Presets & Filters
Google Play
$189.4K/mo
~$2.27M/yr · 3.1M installs
Revenue winner TON: Filters for Video & Photo wins +18942800% vs other
Installs winner TON: Filters for Video & Photo wins +7261% vs other
MAU winner TON: Filters for Video & Photo wins +3703% vs other
Rating winner TON: Filters for Video & Photo wins +442% vs other

Why TON: Filters for Video & Photo is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. TON: Filters for Video & Photo earns roughly 189428× more per month than カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - $189.4K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. TON: Filters for Video & Photo runs a $14.48/mo subscription that compounds; カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. TON: Filters for Video & Photo has ~3.1M lifetime installs vs カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)'s ~42K - 73.6× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. TON: Filters for Video & Photo sits at 4.42★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TON: Filters for Video & Photo report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)
vs
TON: Filters for Video & Photo
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$189.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$2.27M
Lifetime installs (est.)
42K
▶
3.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
13K
▶
481K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.42★
Total ratings
0
▶
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$14.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

カプセルシェア(Capsule Share)

Devision
Google Play
Category
Photography
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Oct 31, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Teen
Version
1.0.4
Languages
-
View full カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) report →

TON: Filters for Video & Photo

Mobile Presets & Filters
Google Play
Category
Photography
Price
Free
Released
Jun 7, 2022
Last updated
Oct 28, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.5.1
Languages
-
View full TON: Filters for Video & Photo report →

カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

TON: Filters for Video & Photo trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) Play Store page →TON: Filters for Video & Photo Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Capsule Share Android vs Deepskycamera PRO AndroidCapsule Share Android vs Faceapp Perfect Face Editor AndroidCapsule Share Android vs Grayzone Meter AndroidCapsule Share Android vs Lightroom Photo Video Editor AndroidCapsule Share Android vs Picsart AI Photo Editor Video AndroidAmazon Photos Photo Video Android vs Capsule Share Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
TON: Filters for Video & Photo earns about $189.4K per month, while カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$189.4K more per month for TON: Filters for Video & Photo). Annual revenue: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) ≈ $0/year, TON: Filters for Video & Photo ≈ $2.27M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
TON: Filters for Video & Photo leads with about 3.1M estimated downloads vs 42K for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) - a 73.6× gap. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. TON: Filters for Video & Photo reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and TON: Filters for Video & Photo in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and TON: Filters for Video & Photo offer? v
カプセルシェア(Capsule Share): no IAP detected on the public listing. TON: Filters for Video & Photo: IAP range $6.99 - $29.99 per item. カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; TON: Filters for Video & Photo runs "Subscription (~$14.48/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
TON: Filters for Video & Photo edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.4 stars). Rating volume: カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) 0 ratings, TON: Filters for Video & Photo 71 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) and $189.4K for TON: Filters for Video & Photo are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare カプセルシェア(Capsule Share) or TON: Filters for Video & Photo to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.