Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker
Reform LLC
App Store
$44.1K/mo
~$528.9K/yr · 629K installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.36M/mo
~$16.33M/yr · 101.6M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2987% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+16041% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+4308% vs other
Rating winner
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker wins
+7% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 31× more per month than Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - $1.36M vs $44.1K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's ~629K - 161.4× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #94 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$44.1K
▶
$1.36M
Annual revenue (est.)
$528.9K
▶
$16.33M
Lifetime installs (est.)
629K
▶
101.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
164K
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.83★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
8K
▶
677K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#94
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 21, 2020
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 101.8 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.76.5784
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.36M per month, while Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker earns about $44.1K. That is a 30.9× revenue gap (~$1.32M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker ≈ $528.9K/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $16.33M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 629K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - a 161.4× gap. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #94". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker 8K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $44.1K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and $1.36M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.