Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker
Reform LLC
App Store
$43.7K/mo
~$524.2K/yr · 624K installs
VS
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+12289% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+15722% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+15417% vs other
Rating winner
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker wins
+7% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 124× more per month than Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - $5.41M vs $43.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's ~624K - 158.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker
vs
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$43.7K
▶
$5.41M
Annual revenue (est.)
$524.2K
▶
$64.94M
Lifetime installs (est.)
624K
▶
98.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
162K
▶
25.2M
App Store rating
4.83★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
8K
▶
658K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 21, 2020
- Last updated
- Jan 12, 2026
- File size
- 111.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.74.4732
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker trajectory
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker earns about $43.7K. That is a 123.9× revenue gap (~$5.37M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker ≈ $524.2K/year, Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 624K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - a 158.2× gap. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings.
Are Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Fitbit: Health & Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Fitbit: Health & Fitness offer? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker 8K ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $43.7K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitbit: Health & Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.