Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes

Chello Publishing
App Store
$140/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 1K installs
VS

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +3865178% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +7308278% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +6953767% vs other
Rating winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +24% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 38653× more per month than Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - $5.41M vs $140.
  2. Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's $7.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's ~1K - 73083.8× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 3.65★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
vs
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$140
▶
$5.41M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.7K
▶
$64.94M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
98.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
361.8
▶
25.2M
App Store rating
3.65★
▶
4.53★
Total ratings
54
▶
658K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$7.99
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
2 tiers

Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes

Chello Publishing
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Aug 30, 2010
Last updated
Apr 25, 2026
File size
94.5 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
5.52.1
Languages
English
View full Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes App Store page →Fitbit: Health & Fitness App Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Carbs Cals Diet Diabetes iOSCarbs Cals Diet Diabetes iOS vs Calorie Counter Mynetdiary AndroidCarbs Cals Diet Diabetes iOS vs Cal AI Food Calorie Tracker AndroidCarbs Cals Diet Diabetes iOS vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidCarbs Cals Diet Diabetes iOS vs Stompers Step Counter Friends iOSCarbs Cals Diet Diabetes iOS vs Cult Fit Gym Workout Fitness iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $140. That is a 38652.8× revenue gap (~$5.41M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $1.7K/year, Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 1K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - a 73083.8× gap. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's App Store downloads are estimated from 54 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings.
Are Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Fitbit: Health & Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Fitbit: Health & Fitness offer? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 54 ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $140 for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitbit: Health & Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.