Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Chello Publishing
App Store
$142/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 1K installs
VS
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Ramzy Nanou
App Store
$37.5K/mo
~$450.1K/yr · 448K installs
Revenue winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+26312% vs other
Installs winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+32517% vs other
MAU winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+31539% vs other
Rating winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+32% vs other
Why Ivy: Processed Food Scanner is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns roughly 264× more per month than Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - $37.5K vs $142.
- Premium pricing. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner charges $9.99/mo vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's $7.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner has ~448K lifetime installs vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's ~1K - 326.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner sits at 4.77★ vs 3.60★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Ivy: Processed Food Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$142
▶
$37.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.7K
▶
$450.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
448K
Monthly active users (est.)?
367.125
▶
116K
App Store rating
3.60★
▶
4.77★
Total ratings
55
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$7.99
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 30, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- 105.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.54.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 12, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 22, 2026
- File size
- 64.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.3.8
- Languages
- English
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns about $37.5K per month, while Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $142. That is a 264.1× revenue gap (~$37.4K more per month for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner). Annual revenue: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $1.7K/year, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner ≈ $450.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner leads with about 448K estimated downloads vs 1K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - a 326.2× gap. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's App Store downloads are estimated from 55 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner offer? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 55 ratings, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $142 for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and $37.5K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
