Cardman vs Driverslog Pro 2
Cardman
KauriLab Inc.
App Store
$9/mo
~$103/yr · 900 installs
VS
Driverslog Pro 2
Florian Liefers
App Store
$3/mo
~$37/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Cardman wins
+200% vs other
Installs winner
Cardman wins
+125% vs other
MAU winner
Cardman wins
+119% vs other
Rating winner
Driverslog Pro 2 wins
+7% vs other
Why Cardman is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cardman earns roughly 3× more per month than Driverslog Pro 2 - $9 vs $3.
- Premium pricing. Cardman charges $2.99/mo vs Driverslog Pro 2's $1.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cardman has ~900 lifetime installs vs Driverslog Pro 2's ~400 - 2.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cardman runs 3 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cardman report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$9
◀
$3
Annual revenue (est.)
$103
◀
$37
Lifetime installs (est.)
900
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
106.2
◀
48.4
App Store rating
4.67★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
18
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
◀
$1.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Business
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 18, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 27, 2026
- File size
- 54.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.5.0
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Chinese
- Category
- Business
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 1, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- 32.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.0.8
- Languages
- English, German
Cardman trajectory
Driverslog Pro 2 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cardman or Driverslog Pro 2? v
Cardman earns about $9 per month, while Driverslog Pro 2 earns about $3. That is a 3.0× revenue gap (~$6 more per month for Cardman). Annual revenue: Cardman ≈ $103/year, Driverslog Pro 2 ≈ $37/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cardman or Driverslog Pro 2? v
Cardman leads with about 900 estimated downloads vs 400 for Driverslog Pro 2 - a 2.3× gap. Cardman's App Store downloads are estimated from 18 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Driverslog Pro 2's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are Cardman and Driverslog Pro 2 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Business category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cardman and Driverslog Pro 2 offer? v
Cardman: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Driverslog Pro 2: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Cardman runs a "Subscription (~$2.50/mo)" monetization model; Driverslog Pro 2 runs "Subscription (~$1.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cardman or Driverslog Pro 2? v
Driverslog Pro 2 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Cardman 18 ratings, Driverslog Pro 2 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cardman vs Driverslog Pro 2 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $9 for Cardman and $3 for Driverslog Pro 2 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Business) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cardman or Driverslog Pro 2 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
