carVertical: Check Car History vs CL Theme C1
carVertical: Check Car History
carVertical OÜ
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3.1M installs
VS
CL Theme C1
Apps LabDev
Google Play
$90/mo
~$1.1K/yr · 4K installs
Revenue winner
CL Theme C1 wins
+9000% vs other
Installs winner
carVertical: Check Car History wins
+81233% vs other
MAU winner
carVertical: Check Car History wins
+39114% vs other
Rating winner
carVertical: Check Car History wins
+361% vs other
Why CL Theme C1 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- CL Theme C1 earns roughly 90× more per month than carVertical: Check Car History - $90 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CL Theme C1 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$90
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.1M
◀
4K
Monthly active users (est.)?
165K
◀
420.896
App Store rating
3.61★
◀
-
Total ratings
12K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Auto & Vehicles
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 12, 2020
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.10.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Auto & Vehicles
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Dec 18, 2024
- Last updated
- Jul 8, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3
- Languages
- -
carVertical: Check Car History trajectory
CL Theme C1 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, carVertical: Check Car History or CL Theme C1? v
CL Theme C1 earns about $90 per month, while carVertical: Check Car History earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$90 more per month for CL Theme C1). Annual revenue: carVertical: Check Car History ≈ $0/year, CL Theme C1 ≈ $1.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, carVertical: Check Car History or CL Theme C1? v
carVertical: Check Car History leads with about 3.1M estimated downloads vs 4K for CL Theme C1 - a 813.3× gap. carVertical: Check Car History reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. CL Theme C1 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are carVertical: Check Car History and CL Theme C1 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Auto & Vehicles category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do carVertical: Check Car History and CL Theme C1 have in-app purchases? v
carVertical: Check Car History does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. CL Theme C1 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: carVertical: Check Car History runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", CL Theme C1 runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, carVertical: Check Car History or CL Theme C1? v
carVertical: Check Car History edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.6 stars). Rating volume: carVertical: Check Car History 40 ratings, CL Theme C1 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these carVertical: Check Car History vs CL Theme C1 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for carVertical: Check Car History and $90 for CL Theme C1 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Auto & Vehicles) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare carVertical: Check Car History or CL Theme C1 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
