Catan Classic vs Chess Pro

Catan Classic

USM
Google Play
$56.8K/mo
~$681.5K/yr · 862K installs
VS

Chess Pro

AI Factory Limited
Google Play
$23.1K/mo
~$276.7K/yr · 385K installs
Revenue winner Catan Classic wins +146% vs other
Installs winner Catan Classic wins +124% vs other
MAU winner Catan Classic wins +20% vs other
Rating winner Chess Pro wins +99% vs other

Why Catan Classic is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Catan Classic earns roughly 2× more per month than Chess Pro - $56.8K vs $23.1K.
  2. Subscription model. Catan Classic runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; Chess Pro relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Catan Classic has ~862K lifetime installs vs Chess Pro's ~385K - 2.2× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Catan Classic report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Catan Classic
vs
Chess Pro
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$56.8K
$23.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$681.5K
$276.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
862K
385K
Monthly active users (est.)?
70K
58K
App Store rating
2.40★
4.79★
Total ratings
28K
22K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Catan Classic

USM
Google Play
Category
Board
Price
USD5.49
Released
Jul 1, 2011
Last updated
Mar 27, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.8.3
Languages
-
View full Catan Classic report →

Chess Pro

AI Factory Limited
Google Play
Category
Board
Price
USD4.99
Released
Aug 27, 2010
Last updated
May 14, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.23
Languages
-
View full Chess Pro report →

Catan Classic trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Chess Pro trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

FAQ

Which makes more money, Catan Classic or Chess Pro? v
Catan Classic earns about $56.8K per month, while Chess Pro earns about $23.1K. That is a 2.5× revenue gap (~$33.7K more per month for Catan Classic). Annual revenue: Catan Classic ≈ $681.5K/year, Chess Pro ≈ $276.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Catan Classic or Chess Pro? v
Catan Classic leads with about 862K estimated downloads vs 385K for Chess Pro - a 2.2× gap. Catan Classic reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. Chess Pro reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Catan Classic and Chess Pro in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Board category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Catan Classic and Chess Pro offer? v
Catan Classic: IAP range $2.49 - $9.99 per item. Chess Pro: no IAP detected on the public listing. Catan Classic runs a "Paid app ($5.49)" monetization model; Chess Pro runs "Paid app ($4.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Catan Classic or Chess Pro? v
Chess Pro edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 2.4 (gap of 2.4 stars). Rating volume: Catan Classic 4K ratings, Chess Pro 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Catan Classic vs Chess Pro revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $56.8K for Catan Classic and $23.1K for Chess Pro are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Board) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Catan Classic or Chess Pro to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.