CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker
CellarTracker
App Store
$73.0K/mo
~$876.1K/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$57/mo
~$685/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+127981% vs other
Installs winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+42513% vs other
MAU winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+42513% vs other
Rating winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+0% vs other
Why CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker earns roughly 1281× more per month than Fork Ranger - sustainable food - $73.0K vs $57.
- Premium pricing. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker charges $14.99/mo vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's $3.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker has ~1.3M lifetime installs vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's ~3K - 426.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker runs 6 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker
vs
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$73.0K
◀
$57
Annual revenue (est.)
$876.1K
◀
$685
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
151K
◀
354
App Store rating
4.91★
◀
4.90★
Total ratings
11K
◀
59
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
$3.00
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
4 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 15, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 19, 2026
- File size
- 73.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.19.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- 34.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.3.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker trajectory
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker earns about $73.0K per month, while Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $57. That is a 1280.8× revenue gap (~$72.9K more per month for CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker). Annual revenue: CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker ≈ $876.1K/year, Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $685/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 426.1× gap. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 11K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 59 ratings.
Are CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker and Fork Ranger - sustainable food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker and Fork Ranger - sustainable food offer? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker 11K ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food 59 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $73.0K for CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker and $57 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Fork Ranger - sustainable food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.