CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker vs Plan to Eat
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker
CellarTracker
App Store
$73.0K/mo
~$876.1K/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
Revenue winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+768% vs other
Installs winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+164% vs other
MAU winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+166% vs other
Rating winner
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker earns roughly 9× more per month than Plan to Eat - $73.0K vs $8.4K.
- Premium pricing. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker charges $14.99/mo vs Plan to Eat's $4.58/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker has ~1.3M lifetime installs vs Plan to Eat's ~476K - 2.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker runs 6 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$73.0K
◀
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$876.1K
◀
$100.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
◀
476K
Monthly active users (est.)?
151K
◀
57K
App Store rating
4.91★
◀
4.84★
Total ratings
11K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 15, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 19, 2026
- File size
- 73.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.19.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Plan to Eat? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker earns about $73.0K per month, while Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K. That is a 8.7× revenue gap (~$64.6K more per month for CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker). Annual revenue: CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker ≈ $876.1K/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Plan to Eat? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 476K for Plan to Eat - a 2.6× gap. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 11K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker and Plan to Eat offer? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Plan to Eat? v
CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker 11K ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $73.0K for CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CellarTracker: #1 Wine Tracker or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
