Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra
Cheaf
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 5.8M installs
VS
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go Aps
Google Play
$803.4K/mo
~$9.64M/yr · 78.6M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+80335400% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1252% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+588% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+4% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 803354× more per month than Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra - $803.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~78.6M lifetime installs vs Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra's ~5.8M - 13.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$803.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$9.64M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.8M
▶
78.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
343K
▶
2.4M
App Store rating
4.64★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
71K
▶
1.9M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 20, 2020
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.9.695
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 14, 2016
- Last updated
- May 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- -
Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra trajectory
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $803.4K per month, while Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$803.4K more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra ≈ $0/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $9.64M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 78.6M estimated downloads vs 5.8M for Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra - a 13.5× gap. Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste have in-app purchases? v
Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)".
Which has better ratings, Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra 3 ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 13K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra and $803.4K for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cheaf: Salva comida y ahorra or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.