ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker
MIU Digital Limited
App Store
$108/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 10K installs
VS
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+5304992% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+783530% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+682198% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+11% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 53051× more per month than ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker - $5.73M vs $108.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker's ~10K - 7836.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 4.44★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$108
▶
$5.73M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.3K
▶
$68.75M
Lifetime installs (est.)
10K
▶
75.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
7.6M
App Store rating
4.44★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
192
▶
502K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 10, 2026
- File size
- 93.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.1.4
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker trajectory
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker earns about $108. That is a 53050.9× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker ≈ $1.3K/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 10K for ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker - a 7836.3× gap. ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 189 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings.
Are ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.99/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker 189 ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $108 for ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker and $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
