Chick-fil-A vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Chick-fil-A

Chick-fil-A, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 681.4M installs
VS

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
$57/mo
~$685/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +5700% vs other
Installs winner Chick-fil-A wins +23099679% vs other
MAU winner Chick-fil-A wins +1924882% vs other
Rating winner Chick-fil-A wins +1% vs other

Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 57× more per month than Chick-fil-A - $57 vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a $3.00/mo subscription that compounds; Chick-fil-A relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. More monetization surfaces. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Chick-fil-A
vs
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$57
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$685
Lifetime installs (est.)
681.4M
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
6.8M
354
App Store rating
4.93★
4.90★
Total ratings
4.0M
59
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$3.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
4 tiers

Chick-fil-A

Chick-fil-A, Inc.
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 16, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
106.3 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2026.9.0
Languages
English
View full Chick-fil-A report →

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2021
Last updated
May 9, 2026
File size
34.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.3.1
Languages
Dutch, English, German
View full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report →

Chick-fil-A trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Chick-fil-A or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $57 per month, while Chick-fil-A earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$57 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: Chick-fil-A ≈ $0/year, Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $685/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chick-fil-A or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Chick-fil-A leads with about 681.4M estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 230997.8× gap. Chick-fil-A's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.0M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 59 ratings.
Are Chick-fil-A and Fork Ranger - sustainable food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Chick-fil-A and Fork Ranger - sustainable food offer? v
Chick-fil-A: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Chick-fil-A runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Chick-fil-A or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Chick-fil-A edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Chick-fil-A 4.0M ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food 59 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chick-fil-A vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Chick-fil-A and $57 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chick-fil-A or Fork Ranger - sustainable food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.