Chick-fil-A vs Plan to Eat
Chick-fil-A
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 681.0M installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+841200% vs other
Installs winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+142965% vs other
MAU winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+11922% vs other
Rating winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+2% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 8412× more per month than Chick-fil-A - $8.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Plan to Eat runs a $4.58/mo subscription that compounds; Chick-fil-A relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Chick-fil-A
vs
Plan to Eat
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$100.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
681.0M
◀
476K
Monthly active users (est.)?
6.8M
◀
57K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.84★
Total ratings
4.0M
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 16, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 106.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2026.9.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
Chick-fil-A trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Chick-fil-A or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while Chick-fil-A earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$8.4K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Chick-fil-A ≈ $0/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chick-fil-A or Plan to Eat? v
Chick-fil-A leads with about 681.0M estimated downloads vs 476K for Plan to Eat - a 1430.7× gap. Chick-fil-A's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.0M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Chick-fil-A and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Chick-fil-A and Plan to Eat offer? v
Chick-fil-A: no IAP detected on the public listing. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Chick-fil-A runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Chick-fil-A or Plan to Eat? v
Chick-fil-A edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Chick-fil-A 4.0M ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chick-fil-A vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Chick-fil-A and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chick-fil-A or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.