Chick-fil-A vs ResX
Chick-fil-A
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 681.4M installs
VS
ResX
ResX
App Store
$677/mo
~$8.1K/yr · 18K installs
Revenue winner
ResX wins
+67700% vs other
Installs winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+3828234% vs other
MAU winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+324335% vs other
Rating winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+6% vs other
Why ResX is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- ResX earns roughly 677× more per month than Chick-fil-A - $677 vs $0.
- Subscription model. ResX runs a $14.99/mo subscription that compounds; Chick-fil-A relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. ResX runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Chick-fil-A
vs
ResX
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$677
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$8.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
681.4M
◀
18K
Monthly active users (est.)?
6.8M
◀
2K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
4.0M
◀
356
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 16, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 106.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2026.9.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2023
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 127.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.8.19
- Languages
- English
Chick-fil-A trajectory
ResX trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Chick-fil-A or ResX? v
ResX earns about $677 per month, while Chick-fil-A earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$677 more per month for ResX). Annual revenue: Chick-fil-A ≈ $0/year, ResX ≈ $8.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chick-fil-A or ResX? v
Chick-fil-A leads with about 681.4M estimated downloads vs 18K for ResX - a 38283.3× gap. Chick-fil-A's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.0M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ResX's App Store downloads are estimated from 353 ratings.
Are Chick-fil-A and ResX in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Chick-fil-A and ResX offer? v
Chick-fil-A: no IAP detected on the public listing. ResX: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Chick-fil-A runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; ResX runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Chick-fil-A or ResX? v
Chick-fil-A edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Chick-fil-A 4.0M ratings, ResX 353 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chick-fil-A vs ResX revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Chick-fil-A and $677 for ResX are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chick-fil-A or ResX to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.