Chick-fil-A vs Roman: budget weight loss
Chick-fil-A
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 696.1M installs
VS
Roman: budget weight loss
Roman Kuryanov
App Store
$7/mo
~$81/yr · 650 installs
Revenue winner
Roman: budget weight loss wins
+700% vs other
Installs winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+107088418% vs other
MAU winner
Chick-fil-A wins
+8850191% vs other
Rating winner
Roman: budget weight loss wins
+1% vs other
Why Roman: budget weight loss is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Roman: budget weight loss earns roughly 7× more per month than Chick-fil-A - $7 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Roman: budget weight loss report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Chick-fil-A
vs
Roman: budget weight loss
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$7
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$81
Lifetime installs (est.)
696.1M
◀
650
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.0M
◀
78.65
App Store rating
4.93★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
4.1M
◀
13
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 16, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 121.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2026.12.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD0.39
- Released
- Aug 14, 2018
- Last updated
- Jan 20, 2026
- File size
- 17.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.0
- Languages
- English, Russian, Chinese, Chinese
Chick-fil-A trajectory
Roman: budget weight loss trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Chick-fil-A or Roman: budget weight loss? v
Roman: budget weight loss earns about $7 per month, while Chick-fil-A earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$7 more per month for Roman: budget weight loss). Annual revenue: Chick-fil-A ≈ $0/year, Roman: budget weight loss ≈ $81/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chick-fil-A or Roman: budget weight loss? v
Chick-fil-A leads with about 696.1M estimated downloads vs 650 for Roman: budget weight loss - a 1070885.2× gap. Chick-fil-A's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.1M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Roman: budget weight loss's App Store downloads are estimated from 13 ratings.
Are Chick-fil-A and Roman: budget weight loss in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Chick-fil-A and Roman: budget weight loss have in-app purchases? v
Chick-fil-A does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Roman: budget weight loss does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Chick-fil-A runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Roman: budget weight loss runs "Paid app ($0.39)".
Which has better ratings, Chick-fil-A or Roman: budget weight loss? v
Roman: budget weight loss edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Chick-fil-A 4.1M ratings, Roman: budget weight loss 13 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chick-fil-A vs Roman: budget weight loss revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Chick-fil-A and $7 for Roman: budget weight loss are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chick-fil-A or Roman: budget weight loss to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.