Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ vs h015 Happy Analog Hybrid
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+
OQ Watchfaces
Google Play
$47/mo
~$566/yr · 3K installs
VS
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid
Happy Watch Faces
Google Play
$65/mo
~$775/yr · 1K installs
Revenue winner
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid wins
+38% vs other
Installs winner
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ wins
+145% vs other
MAU winner
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ wins
+105% vs other
Rating winner
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ wins
+381% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+
vs
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$47
▶
$65
Annual revenue (est.)
$566
▶
$775
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
◀
1K
Monthly active users (est.)?
247.878
◀
120.736
App Store rating
3.81★
◀
-
Total ratings
56
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Jan 10, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 11, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Jan 8, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ trajectory
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or h015 Happy Analog Hybrid? v
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid earns about $65 per month, while Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ earns about $47. That is a 1.4× revenue gap (~$18 more per month for h015 Happy Analog Hybrid). Annual revenue: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ ≈ $566/year, h015 Happy Analog Hybrid ≈ $775/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or h015 Happy Analog Hybrid? v
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 1K for h015 Happy Analog Hybrid - a 2.4× gap. Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. h015 Happy Analog Hybrid reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ and h015 Happy Analog Hybrid in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ and h015 Happy Analog Hybrid have in-app purchases? v
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. h015 Happy Analog Hybrid does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ runs "Paid app ($1.49)", h015 Happy Analog Hybrid runs "Paid app ($4.99)".
Which has better ratings, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or h015 Happy Analog Hybrid? v
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.8 stars). Rating volume: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ 2 ratings, h015 Happy Analog Hybrid 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ vs h015 Happy Analog Hybrid revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $47 for Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ and $65 for h015 Happy Analog Hybrid are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or h015 Happy Analog Hybrid to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.