Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ vs Android Widgets (Material U)

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+

OQ Watchfaces
Google Play
$47/mo
~$566/yr · 3K installs
VS

Android Widgets (Material U)

Dita Cristian Ionut
Google Play
$1.4K/mo
~$16.4K/yr · 280K installs
Revenue winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +2815% vs other
Installs winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +10526% vs other
MAU winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +9621% vs other
Rating winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +12% vs other

Why Android Widgets (Material U) is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Android Widgets (Material U) earns roughly 29× more per month than Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ - $1.4K vs $47.
  2. Subscription model. Android Widgets (Material U) runs a $1.40/mo subscription that compounds; Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Android Widgets (Material U) has ~280K lifetime installs vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+'s ~3K - 106.3× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Android Widgets (Material U) sits at 4.27★ vs 3.81★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Android Widgets (Material U) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+
vs
Android Widgets (Material U)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$47
▶
$1.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$566
▶
$16.4K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
280K
Monthly active users (est.)?
247.878
▶
24K
App Store rating
3.81★
▶
4.27★
Total ratings
56
▶
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$1.40
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+

OQ Watchfaces
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.49
Released
Jan 10, 2025
Last updated
Jan 11, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ report →

Android Widgets (Material U)

Dita Cristian Ionut
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
Free
Released
Oct 19, 2021
Last updated
Oct 6, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
3.3.0
Languages
-
View full Android Widgets (Material U) report →

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Android Widgets (Material U) trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ Play Store page →Android Widgets (Material U) Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Moonlit Walls AndroidChronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Pixel 4 S Rush Hour Watch Face AndroidAce of Horizons Watch Face Android vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 AndroidChronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Nxv01 Flower Bloom Watch Face AndroidAqua Kwgt Android vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 AndroidChronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Nxv43 Elegant Watch Face Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or Android Widgets (Material U)? v
Android Widgets (Material U) earns about $1.4K per month, while Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ earns about $47. That is a 29.1× revenue gap (~$1.3K more per month for Android Widgets (Material U)). Annual revenue: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ ≈ $566/year, Android Widgets (Material U) ≈ $16.4K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or Android Widgets (Material U)? v
Android Widgets (Material U) leads with about 280K estimated downloads vs 3K for Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ - a 106.3× gap. Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Android Widgets (Material U) reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ and Android Widgets (Material U) in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ and Android Widgets (Material U) offer? v
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+: no IAP detected on the public listing. Android Widgets (Material U): IAP range $0.99 - $1.99 per item. Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ runs a "Paid app ($1.49)" monetization model; Android Widgets (Material U) runs "Subscription (~$1.40/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or Android Widgets (Material U)? v
Android Widgets (Material U) edges ahead with ★ 4.3 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ 2 ratings, Android Widgets (Material U) 77 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ vs Android Widgets (Material U) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $47 for Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ and $1.4K for Android Widgets (Material U) are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 4+ or Android Widgets (Material U) to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.