Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ vs Pix Material Expressive Icons

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+

OQ Watchfaces
Google Play
$54/mo
~$647/yr · 3K installs
VS

Pix Material Expressive Icons

PashaPuma Design
Google Play
$764/mo
~$9.2K/yr · 32K installs
Revenue winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +1315% vs other
Installs winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +961% vs other
MAU winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +999% vs other
Rating winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +12% vs other

Why Pix Material Expressive Icons is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Pix Material Expressive Icons earns roughly 14× more per month than Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ - $764 vs $54.
  2. Subscription model. Pix Material Expressive Icons runs a $3.14/mo subscription that compounds; Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Pix Material Expressive Icons has ~32K lifetime installs vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+'s ~3K - 10.6× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Pix Material Expressive Icons sits at 4.47★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pix Material Expressive Icons report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+
vs
Pix Material Expressive Icons
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$54
▶
$764
Annual revenue (est.)
$647
▶
$9.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
32K
Monthly active users (est.)?
337.568
▶
4K
App Store rating
4.00★
▶
4.47★
Total ratings
69
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$3.14
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+

OQ Watchfaces
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.49
Released
Jan 10, 2025
Last updated
May 25, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ report →

Pix Material Expressive Icons

PashaPuma Design
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.99
Released
Sep 5, 2021
Last updated
Jun 12, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
11.8.0.Build
Languages
-
View full Pix Material Expressive Icons report →

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Pix Material Expressive Icons trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ Play Store page →Pix Material Expressive Icons Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Moonlit Walls AndroidChronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Pixel 4 S Rush Hour Watch Face AndroidAce of Horizons Watch Face Android vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 AndroidChronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Nxv01 Flower Bloom Watch Face AndroidAqua Kwgt Android vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 AndroidChronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 Android vs Nxv43 Elegant Watch Face Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons earns about $764 per month, while Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ earns about $54. That is a 14.1× revenue gap (~$710 more per month for Pix Material Expressive Icons). Annual revenue: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ ≈ $647/year, Pix Material Expressive Icons ≈ $9.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons leads with about 32K estimated downloads vs 3K for Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ - a 10.6× gap. Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Pix Material Expressive Icons reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ and Pix Material Expressive Icons in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ and Pix Material Expressive Icons offer? v
Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pix Material Expressive Icons: IAP range $0.99 - $9.99 per item. Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ runs a "Paid app ($1.49)" monetization model; Pix Material Expressive Icons runs "Paid app ($1.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ 3 ratings, Pix Material Expressive Icons 86 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ vs Pix Material Expressive Icons revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $54 for Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ and $764 for Pix Material Expressive Icons are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Chronograph Hybrid 2 WearOS 5+ or Pix Material Expressive Icons to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.