Ciclogreen: Carpooling vs HUNGRY in
Ciclogreen: Carpooling
Ciclogreen Move & Win SL
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 99K installs
VS
HUNGRY in
The Asia Collective PTE LTD
Google Play
$129/mo
~$1.5K/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
HUNGRY in wins
+12900% vs other
Installs winner
Ciclogreen: Carpooling wins
+2945% vs other
MAU winner
Ciclogreen: Carpooling wins
+2805% vs other
Rating winner
Ciclogreen: Carpooling wins
+338% vs other
Why HUNGRY in is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- HUNGRY in earns roughly 129× more per month than Ciclogreen: Carpooling - $129 vs $0.
- Subscription model. HUNGRY in runs a $7.03/mo subscription that compounds; Ciclogreen: Carpooling relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full HUNGRY in report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Ciclogreen: Carpooling
vs
HUNGRY in
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$129
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
99K
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
16K
◀
563.98
App Store rating
3.38★
◀
-
Total ratings
2K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$7.03
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 29, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 19.5.6
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 19, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.8.0
- Languages
- -
Ciclogreen: Carpooling trajectory
HUNGRY in trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or HUNGRY in? v
HUNGRY in earns about $129 per month, while Ciclogreen: Carpooling earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$129 more per month for HUNGRY in). Annual revenue: Ciclogreen: Carpooling ≈ $0/year, HUNGRY in ≈ $1.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or HUNGRY in? v
Ciclogreen: Carpooling leads with about 99K estimated downloads vs 3K for HUNGRY in - a 30.5× gap. Ciclogreen: Carpooling reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play. HUNGRY in reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Ciclogreen: Carpooling and HUNGRY in in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Ciclogreen: Carpooling and HUNGRY in offer? v
Ciclogreen: Carpooling: no IAP detected on the public listing. HUNGRY in: IAP range $0.99 - $49.99 per item. Ciclogreen: Carpooling runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; HUNGRY in runs "Subscription (~$7.03/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or HUNGRY in? v
Ciclogreen: Carpooling edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.4 stars). Rating volume: Ciclogreen: Carpooling 4 ratings, HUNGRY in 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ciclogreen: Carpooling vs HUNGRY in revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Ciclogreen: Carpooling and $129 for HUNGRY in are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ciclogreen: Carpooling or HUNGRY in to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.