Ciclogreen: Carpooling vs GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas
Ciclogreen: Carpooling
Ciclogreen Move And Win S.L.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas
GasBuddy Organization Inc
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 67.1M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas wins
+16779613% vs other
MAU winner
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas wins
+9664165% vs other
Rating winner
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas wins
+65% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Ciclogreen: Carpooling
vs
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
67.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
63.2
▶
6.1M
App Store rating
2.83★
▶
4.69★
Total ratings
6
▶
447K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 12, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 219.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 18.35.6
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, English, French, GL, German +4 more
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 17, 2010
- Last updated
- May 18, 2026
- File size
- 159.6 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 702.2.26371
- Languages
- English, French
Ciclogreen: Carpooling trajectory
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas? v
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas earns about $0 per month, while Ciclogreen: Carpooling earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Ciclogreen: Carpooling ≈ $0/year, GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas? v
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas leads with about 67.1M estimated downloads vs 400 for Ciclogreen: Carpooling - a 167797.1× gap. Ciclogreen: Carpooling's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas's App Store downloads are estimated from 447K ratings.
Are Ciclogreen: Carpooling and GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Ciclogreen: Carpooling and GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas have in-app purchases? v
Ciclogreen: Carpooling does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Ciclogreen: Carpooling runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas? v
GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 2.8 (gap of 1.9 stars). Rating volume: Ciclogreen: Carpooling 6 ratings, GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas 447K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ciclogreen: Carpooling vs GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Ciclogreen: Carpooling and $0 for GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ciclogreen: Carpooling or GasBuddy: Find & Pay for Gas to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.