Ciclogreen: Carpooling vs PadsPass
Ciclogreen: Carpooling
Ciclogreen Move And Win S.L.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS
PadsPass
PadsPass Inc.
App Store
$27/mo
~$319/yr · 550 installs
Revenue winner
PadsPass wins
+2700% vs other
Installs winner
PadsPass wins
+38% vs other
MAU winner
PadsPass wins
+57% vs other
Rating winner
PadsPass wins
+59% vs other
Why PadsPass is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PadsPass earns roughly 27× more per month than Ciclogreen: Carpooling - $27 vs $0.
- Subscription model. PadsPass runs a $8.33/mo subscription that compounds; Ciclogreen: Carpooling relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. PadsPass sits at 4.50★ vs 2.83★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PadsPass report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$27
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$319
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
550
Monthly active users (est.)?
63.2
▶
99
App Store rating
2.83★
▶
4.50★
Total ratings
6
▶
10
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$8.33
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 12, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 219.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 18.35.6
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, English, French, GL, German +4 more
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 16, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 67.6 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 0.9.24
- Languages
- English
Ciclogreen: Carpooling trajectory
PadsPass trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or PadsPass? v
PadsPass earns about $27 per month, while Ciclogreen: Carpooling earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$27 more per month for PadsPass). Annual revenue: Ciclogreen: Carpooling ≈ $0/year, PadsPass ≈ $319/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or PadsPass? v
PadsPass leads with about 550 estimated downloads vs 400 for Ciclogreen: Carpooling - a 1.4× gap. Ciclogreen: Carpooling's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PadsPass's App Store downloads are estimated from 10 ratings.
Are Ciclogreen: Carpooling and PadsPass in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Ciclogreen: Carpooling and PadsPass offer? v
Ciclogreen: Carpooling: no IAP detected on the public listing. PadsPass: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Ciclogreen: Carpooling runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; PadsPass runs "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Ciclogreen: Carpooling or PadsPass? v
PadsPass edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 2.8 (gap of 1.7 stars). Rating volume: Ciclogreen: Carpooling 6 ratings, PadsPass 10 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ciclogreen: Carpooling vs PadsPass revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Ciclogreen: Carpooling and $27 for PadsPass are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ciclogreen: Carpooling or PadsPass to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
