CieID vs PrivacyHawk
CieID
Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato Spa
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 10K installs
VS
PrivacyHawk
PrivacyHawk, Inc.
App Store
$15.7K/mo
~$188.3K/yr · 664K installs
Revenue winner
PrivacyHawk wins
+1569300% vs other
Installs winner
PrivacyHawk wins
+6350% vs other
MAU winner
PrivacyHawk wins
+6520% vs other
Rating winner
PrivacyHawk wins
+10% vs other
Why PrivacyHawk is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PrivacyHawk earns roughly 15693× more per month than CieID - $15.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. PrivacyHawk runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; CieID relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. PrivacyHawk has ~664K lifetime installs vs CieID's ~10K - 64.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. PrivacyHawk runs 10 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PrivacyHawk report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
CieID
vs
PrivacyHawk
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$15.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$188.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10K
▶
664K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
78K
App Store rating
4.16★
▶
4.56★
Total ratings
206
▶
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 2, 2020
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- File size
- 34.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.7.29
- Languages
- German, Italian
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 31, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- 85.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.9.0
- Languages
- English
CieID trajectory
PrivacyHawk trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CieID or PrivacyHawk? v
PrivacyHawk earns about $15.7K per month, while CieID earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$15.7K more per month for PrivacyHawk). Annual revenue: CieID ≈ $0/year, PrivacyHawk ≈ $188.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CieID or PrivacyHawk? v
PrivacyHawk leads with about 664K estimated downloads vs 10K for CieID - a 64.5× gap. CieID's App Store downloads are estimated from 206 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PrivacyHawk's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings.
Are CieID and PrivacyHawk in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CieID and PrivacyHawk offer? v
CieID: no IAP detected on the public listing. PrivacyHawk: IAP range 10 tiers detected. CieID runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; PrivacyHawk runs "Subscription (~$6.25/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CieID or PrivacyHawk? v
PrivacyHawk edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: CieID 206 ratings, PrivacyHawk 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CieID vs PrivacyHawk revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for CieID and $15.7K for PrivacyHawk are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CieID or PrivacyHawk to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.