CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Blitzrechnen
CITB MAP HS&E test V10
CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
VS
Blitzrechnen
Ernst Klett Verlag GmbH
Google Play
$1.0K/mo
~$12.3K/yr · 8K installs
Revenue winner
Blitzrechnen wins
+1272% vs other
Installs winner
Blitzrechnen wins
+1851% vs other
MAU winner
Blitzrechnen wins
+1705% vs other
Rating winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+500% vs other
Why Blitzrechnen is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Blitzrechnen earns roughly 14× more per month than CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - $1.0K vs $75.
- Bigger install base. Blitzrechnen has ~8K lifetime installs vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10's ~400 - 19.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Blitzrechnen report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
CITB MAP HS&E test V10
vs
Blitzrechnen
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75
▶
$1.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$895
▶
$12.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
8K
Monthly active users (est.)?
48.4
▶
873.824
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
-
Total ratings
1
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- May 2, 2023
- Last updated
- Jan 8, 2026
- File size
- 174.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.0.14
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- Jan 31, 2024
- Last updated
- Jul 10, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.4.0
- Languages
- -
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 trajectory
Blitzrechnen trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Blitzrechnen? v
Blitzrechnen earns about $1.0K per month, while CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75. That is a 13.7× revenue gap (~$954 more per month for Blitzrechnen). Annual revenue: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year, Blitzrechnen ≈ $12.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Blitzrechnen? v
Blitzrechnen leads with about 8K estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - a 19.5× gap. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Blitzrechnen reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and Blitzrechnen in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and Blitzrechnen have in-app purchases? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Blitzrechnen does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs "Paid app ($6.99)", Blitzrechnen runs "Paid app ($10.99)".
Which has better ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Blitzrechnen? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 5.0 stars). Rating volume: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings, Blitzrechnen 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Blitzrechnen revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and $1.0K for Blitzrechnen are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Blitzrechnen to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.