CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Laminitis

CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75 per month, while Laminitis earns about $64. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$11 more per month for CITB MAP HS&E test V10). Annual revenue: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year, Laminitis ≈ $767/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Laminitis leads with about 400 estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - a 1.0× gap. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Laminitis's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

CITB MAP HS&E test V10: no IAP detected on the public listing. Laminitis: IAP range 2 tiers detected. CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Laminitis runs "Paid app ($5.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Laminitis edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 5.0 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings, Laminitis 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and $64 for Laminitis are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.