CITB MAP HS&E test V11 vs Lillio
CITB MAP HS&E test V11
CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
VS
Lillio
Hi Mama Inc.
Google Play
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 669K installs
Revenue winner
Lillio wins
+11097% vs other
Installs winner
Lillio wins
+167194% vs other
MAU winner
Lillio wins
+120186% vs other
Rating winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V11 wins
+12% vs other
Why Lillio is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lillio earns roughly 112× more per month than CITB MAP HS&E test V11 - $8.4K vs $75.
- Bigger install base. Lillio has ~669K lifetime installs vs CITB MAP HS&E test V11's ~400 - 1672.9× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
CITB MAP HS&E test V11
vs
Lillio
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75
▶
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$895
▶
$100.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
669K
Monthly active users (est.)?
48.4
▶
58K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.47★
Total ratings
1
▶
10K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- May 2, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 1, 2026
- File size
- 178.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 2, 2015
- Last updated
- Apr 14, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.1.0
- Languages
- -
CITB MAP HS&E test V11 trajectory
Lillio trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CITB MAP HS&E test V11 or Lillio? v
Lillio earns about $8.4K per month, while CITB MAP HS&E test V11 earns about $75. That is a 112.0× revenue gap (~$8.3K more per month for Lillio). Annual revenue: CITB MAP HS&E test V11 ≈ $895/year, Lillio ≈ $100.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB MAP HS&E test V11 or Lillio? v
Lillio leads with about 669K estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V11 - a 1672.9× gap. CITB MAP HS&E test V11's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lillio reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are CITB MAP HS&E test V11 and Lillio in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CITB MAP HS&E test V11 and Lillio offer? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V11: no IAP detected on the public listing. Lillio: IAP range $2.99 per item. CITB MAP HS&E test V11 runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Lillio runs "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V11 or Lillio? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V11 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: CITB MAP HS&E test V11 1 ratings, Lillio 738 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB MAP HS&E test V11 vs Lillio revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V11 and $8.4K for Lillio are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB MAP HS&E test V11 or Lillio to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.