CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs PANTHEON - Official
CITB MAP HS&E test V10
CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
VS
PANTHEON - Official
D'Uva Workshop s.r.l.
App Store
$64/mo
~$764/yr · 1K installs
Revenue winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+17% vs other
Installs winner
PANTHEON - Official wins
+200% vs other
MAU winner
PANTHEON - Official wins
+46% vs other
Rating winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+264% vs other
Why CITB MAP HS&E test V10 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Better app store reviews. CITB MAP HS&E test V10 sits at 5.00★ vs 1.38★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CITB MAP HS&E test V10 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75
◀
$64
Annual revenue (est.)
$895
◀
$764
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
1K
Monthly active users (est.)?
48.4
▶
70.8
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
1.38★
Total ratings
1
▶
24
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- May 2, 2023
- Last updated
- Jan 8, 2026
- File size
- 174.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.0.14
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Jul 14, 2020
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2023
- File size
- 120.3 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 1.3
- Languages
- English
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 trajectory
PANTHEON - Official trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or PANTHEON - Official? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75 per month, while PANTHEON - Official earns about $64. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$11 more per month for CITB MAP HS&E test V10). Annual revenue: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year, PANTHEON - Official ≈ $764/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or PANTHEON - Official? v
PANTHEON - Official leads with about 1K estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - a 3.0× gap. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PANTHEON - Official's App Store downloads are estimated from 24 ratings.
Are CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and PANTHEON - Official in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and PANTHEON - Official have in-app purchases? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PANTHEON - Official does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs "Paid app ($6.99)", PANTHEON - Official runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or PANTHEON - Official? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 1.4 (gap of 3.6 stars). Rating volume: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings, PANTHEON - Official 24 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs PANTHEON - Official revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and $64 for PANTHEON - Official are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or PANTHEON - Official to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
