CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games

CITB MAP HS&E test V10

CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
VS

Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games

The Pinkfong Company
Google Play
$1.49M/mo
~$17.88M/yr · 55.5M installs
Revenue winner Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games wins +1986837% vs other
Installs winner Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games wins +13880354% vs other
MAU winner Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games wins +7915200% vs other
Rating winner CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins +46% vs other

Why Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games earns roughly 19869× more per month than CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - $1.49M vs $75.
  2. Subscription model. Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games runs a $23.20/mo subscription that compounds; CITB MAP HS&E test V10 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games has ~55.5M lifetime installs vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10's ~400 - 138804.5× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

CITB MAP HS&E test V10
vs
Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75
$1.49M
Annual revenue (est.)
$895
$17.88M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
55.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
48.4
3.8M
App Store rating
5.00★
3.42★
Total ratings
1
44K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$23.20
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

CITB MAP HS&E test V10

CITB
App Store
Category
Education
Price
USD6.99
Released
May 2, 2023
Last updated
Jan 8, 2026
File size
174.3 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
2.0.14
Languages
English
View full CITB MAP HS&E test V10 report →

Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games

The Pinkfong Company
Google Play
Category
Education
Price
Free
Released
Aug 31, 2016
Last updated
Apr 22, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
52.20
Languages
-
View full Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games report →

CITB MAP HS&E test V10 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games? v
Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games earns about $1.49M per month, while CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75. That is a 19869.4× revenue gap (~$1.49M more per month for Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games). Annual revenue: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year, Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games ≈ $17.88M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games? v
Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games leads with about 55.5M estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - a 138804.5× gap. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games offer? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games: IAP range $4.99 - $107.88 per item. CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games runs "Subscription (~$23.20/mo, language)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 3.4 (gap of 1.6 stars). Rating volume: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings, Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and $1.49M for Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Pinkfong Baby Shark: Kid Games to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.