CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)

CITB MAP HS&E test V10

CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
VS

Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)

Rosetta Stone, Ltd.
App Store
$2.49M/mo
~$29.88M/yr · 35.5M installs
Revenue winner Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) wins +3319965% vs other
Installs winner Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) wins +8879750% vs other
MAU winner Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) wins +13870079% vs other
Rating winner CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins +5% vs other

Why Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) earns roughly 33201× more per month than CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - $2.49M vs $75.
  2. Subscription model. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) runs a $9.17/mo subscription that compounds; CITB MAP HS&E test V10 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) has ~35.5M lifetime installs vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10's ~400 - 88798.5× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

CITB MAP HS&E test V10
vs
Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$75
$2.49M
Annual revenue (est.)
$895
$29.88M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
35.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
48.4
6.7M
App Store rating
5.00★
4.76★
Total ratings
1
237K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$9.17
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
8 tiers

CITB MAP HS&E test V10

CITB
App Store
Category
Education
Price
USD6.99
Released
May 2, 2023
Last updated
Jan 8, 2026
File size
174.3 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
2.0.14
Languages
English
View full CITB MAP HS&E test V10 report →

Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)

Rosetta Stone, Ltd.
App Store
Category
Education
Price
Free
Released
Jun 2, 2011
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
209.5 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.1.1
Languages
Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian +10 more
View full Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) report →

CITB MAP HS&E test V10 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)? v
Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) earns about $2.49M per month, while CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75. That is a 33200.7× revenue gap (~$2.49M more per month for Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)). Annual revenue: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year, Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) ≈ $29.88M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)? v
Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) leads with about 35.5M estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - a 88798.5× gap. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 237K ratings.
Are CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) offer? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10: no IAP detected on the public listing. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024): IAP range 8 tiers detected. CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) runs "Subscription (~$9.17/mo, language)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings, Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) 237K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB MAP HS&E test V10 vs Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 and $2.49M for Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB MAP HS&E test V10 or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.