CITB: MAP V10 vs Microsoft Authenticator
CITB: MAP V10
CITB
Google Play
$5.2K/mo
~$62.3K/yr · 54K installs
VS
Microsoft Authenticator
Microsoft Corporation
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 218.5M installs
Revenue winner
CITB: MAP V10 wins
+518900% vs other
Installs winner
Microsoft Authenticator wins
+403605% vs other
MAU winner
Microsoft Authenticator wins
+57572% vs other
Rating winner
Microsoft Authenticator wins
+466% vs other
Why CITB: MAP V10 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- CITB: MAP V10 earns roughly 5189× more per month than Microsoft Authenticator - $5.2K vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CITB: MAP V10 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
CITB: MAP V10
vs
Microsoft Authenticator
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.2K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$62.3K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
54K
▶
218.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
6K
▶
3.5M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.66★
Total ratings
0
▶
2.6M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Business
- Price
- USD7.99
- Released
- Apr 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Jan 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 9.10.3.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Business
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 13, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.2605.2973
- Languages
- -
CITB: MAP V10 trajectory
Microsoft Authenticator trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CITB: MAP V10 or Microsoft Authenticator? v
CITB: MAP V10 earns about $5.2K per month, while Microsoft Authenticator earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.2K more per month for CITB: MAP V10). Annual revenue: CITB: MAP V10 ≈ $62.3K/year, Microsoft Authenticator ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB: MAP V10 or Microsoft Authenticator? v
Microsoft Authenticator leads with about 218.5M estimated downloads vs 54K for CITB: MAP V10 - a 4037.0× gap. CITB: MAP V10 reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play. Microsoft Authenticator reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are CITB: MAP V10 and Microsoft Authenticator in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Business category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do CITB: MAP V10 and Microsoft Authenticator have in-app purchases? v
CITB: MAP V10 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Microsoft Authenticator does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: CITB: MAP V10 runs "Paid app ($7.99)", Microsoft Authenticator runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, CITB: MAP V10 or Microsoft Authenticator? v
Microsoft Authenticator edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.7 stars). Rating volume: CITB: MAP V10 0 ratings, Microsoft Authenticator 111K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB: MAP V10 vs Microsoft Authenticator revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.2K for CITB: MAP V10 and $0 for Microsoft Authenticator are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Business) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB: MAP V10 or Microsoft Authenticator to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.