CITB Op/Spec HS&E test vs Plant Identifier: LeafSnap

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test

CITB
App Store
$112/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 600 installs
VS

Plant Identifier: LeafSnap

APPIXI COMPANY LIMITED
App Store
$19.7K/mo
~$236.2K/yr · 350K installs
Revenue winner Plant Identifier: LeafSnap wins +17471% vs other
Installs winner Plant Identifier: LeafSnap wins +58193% vs other
MAU winner Plant Identifier: LeafSnap wins +55785% vs other
Rating winner CITB Op/Spec HS&E test wins +12% vs other

Why Plant Identifier: LeafSnap is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Plant Identifier: LeafSnap earns roughly 176× more per month than CITB Op/Spec HS&E test - $19.7K vs $112.
  2. Subscription model. Plant Identifier: LeafSnap runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; CITB Op/Spec HS&E test relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Plant Identifier: LeafSnap has ~350K lifetime installs vs CITB Op/Spec HS&E test's ~600 - 582.9× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Plant Identifier: LeafSnap runs 6 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plant Identifier: LeafSnap report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test
vs
Plant Identifier: LeafSnap
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$112
▶
$19.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.3K
▶
$236.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
600
▶
350K
Monthly active users (est.)?
72.6
▶
41K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.46★
Total ratings
12
▶
4K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$4.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
6 tiers

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test

CITB
App Store
Category
Education
Price
USD6.99
Released
May 16, 2019
Last updated
Jan 8, 2026
File size
148.2 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
6.0.52
Languages
English
View full CITB Op/Spec HS&E test report →

Plant Identifier: LeafSnap

APPIXI COMPANY LIMITED
App Store
Category
Education
Price
Free
Released
Nov 17, 2019
Last updated
Apr 10, 2026
File size
107.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.79
Languages
English
View full Plant Identifier: LeafSnap report →

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Plant Identifier: LeafSnap trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test App Store page →Plant Identifier: LeafSnap App Store page →

Related comparisons

Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Official Dvsa Theory Test Kit iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Driving Theory Test 4 in 1 Kit iOSCitb Map Hs E Test V10 iOS vs Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOSAnkimobile Flashcards iOS vs Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Official Life in the Uk Test iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs The Official Dvsa Highway Code iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Plant Identifier: LeafSnap? v
Plant Identifier: LeafSnap earns about $19.7K per month, while CITB Op/Spec HS&E test earns about $112. That is a 175.7× revenue gap (~$19.6K more per month for Plant Identifier: LeafSnap). Annual revenue: CITB Op/Spec HS&E test ≈ $1.3K/year, Plant Identifier: LeafSnap ≈ $236.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Plant Identifier: LeafSnap? v
Plant Identifier: LeafSnap leads with about 350K estimated downloads vs 600 for CITB Op/Spec HS&E test - a 582.9× gap. CITB Op/Spec HS&E test's App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plant Identifier: LeafSnap's App Store downloads are estimated from 4K ratings.
Are CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and Plant Identifier: LeafSnap in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and Plant Identifier: LeafSnap offer? v
CITB Op/Spec HS&E test: no IAP detected on the public listing. Plant Identifier: LeafSnap: IAP range 6 tiers detected. CITB Op/Spec HS&E test runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Plant Identifier: LeafSnap runs "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Plant Identifier: LeafSnap? v
CITB Op/Spec HS&E test edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: CITB Op/Spec HS&E test 12 ratings, Plant Identifier: LeafSnap 4K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB Op/Spec HS&E test vs Plant Identifier: LeafSnap revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $112 for CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and $19.7K for Plant Identifier: LeafSnap are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Plant Identifier: LeafSnap to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.