CITB Op/Spec HS&E test vs Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test

CITB
App Store
$112/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 600 installs
VS

Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)

Rosetta Stone, Ltd.
App Store
$2.49M/mo
~$29.88M/yr · 35.5M installs
Revenue winner Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) wins +2223158% vs other
Installs winner Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) wins +5919800% vs other
MAU winner Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) wins +9246686% vs other
Rating winner CITB Op/Spec HS&E test wins +5% vs other

Why Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) earns roughly 22233× more per month than CITB Op/Spec HS&E test - $2.49M vs $112.
  2. Subscription model. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) runs a $9.17/mo subscription that compounds; CITB Op/Spec HS&E test relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) has ~35.5M lifetime installs vs CITB Op/Spec HS&E test's ~600 - 59199.0× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test
vs
Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$112
▶
$2.49M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.3K
▶
$29.88M
Lifetime installs (est.)
600
▶
35.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
72.6
▶
6.7M
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.76★
Total ratings
12
▶
237K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.17
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
8 tiers

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test

CITB
App Store
Category
Education
Price
USD6.99
Released
May 16, 2019
Last updated
Jan 8, 2026
File size
148.2 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
6.0.52
Languages
English
View full CITB Op/Spec HS&E test report →

Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)

Rosetta Stone, Ltd.
App Store
Category
Education
Price
Free
Released
Jun 2, 2011
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
209.5 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.1.1
Languages
Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian +10 more
View full Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) report →

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test App Store page →Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) App Store page →

Related comparisons

Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Official Dvsa Theory Test Kit iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Driving Theory Test 4 in 1 Kit iOSCitb Map Hs E Test V10 iOS vs Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOSAnkimobile Flashcards iOS vs Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Official Life in the Uk Test iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs The Official Dvsa Highway Code iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)? v
Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) earns about $2.49M per month, while CITB Op/Spec HS&E test earns about $112. That is a 22232.6× revenue gap (~$2.49M more per month for Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)). Annual revenue: CITB Op/Spec HS&E test ≈ $1.3K/year, Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) ≈ $29.88M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)? v
Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) leads with about 35.5M estimated downloads vs 600 for CITB Op/Spec HS&E test - a 59199.0× gap. CITB Op/Spec HS&E test's App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 237K ratings.
Are CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) offer? v
CITB Op/Spec HS&E test: no IAP detected on the public listing. Rosetta Stone Classic (2024): IAP range 8 tiers detected. CITB Op/Spec HS&E test runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) runs "Subscription (~$9.17/mo, language)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024)? v
CITB Op/Spec HS&E test edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: CITB Op/Spec HS&E test 12 ratings, Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) 237K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB Op/Spec HS&E test vs Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $112 for CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and $2.49M for Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Rosetta Stone Classic (2024) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.