CITB Op/Spec HS&E test vs Solid Starts: Baby First Foods

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test

CITB
App Store
$112/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 600 installs
VS

Solid Starts: Baby First Foods

SolidStarts LLC
App Store
$120.2K/mo
~$1.44M/yr · 3.7M installs
Revenue winner Solid Starts: Baby First Foods wins +107216% vs other
Installs winner Solid Starts: Baby First Foods wins +621107% vs other
MAU winner Solid Starts: Baby First Foods wins +615973% vs other
Rating winner CITB Op/Spec HS&E test wins +2% vs other

Why Solid Starts: Baby First Foods is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Solid Starts: Baby First Foods earns roughly 1073× more per month than CITB Op/Spec HS&E test - $120.2K vs $112.
  2. Subscription model. Solid Starts: Baby First Foods runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; CITB Op/Spec HS&E test relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Solid Starts: Baby First Foods has ~3.7M lifetime installs vs CITB Op/Spec HS&E test's ~600 - 6212.1× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Solid Starts: Baby First Foods runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Solid Starts: Baby First Foods report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test
vs
Solid Starts: Baby First Foods
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$112
▶
$120.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.3K
▶
$1.44M
Lifetime installs (est.)
600
▶
3.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
72.6
▶
447K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.89★
Total ratings
12
▶
34K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
8 tiers

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test

CITB
App Store
Category
Education
Price
USD6.99
Released
May 16, 2019
Last updated
Jan 8, 2026
File size
148.2 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
6.0.52
Languages
English
View full CITB Op/Spec HS&E test report →

Solid Starts: Baby First Foods

SolidStarts LLC
App Store
Category
Education
Price
Free
Released
May 10, 2021
Last updated
Apr 17, 2026
File size
118.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.30.0
Languages
English
View full Solid Starts: Baby First Foods report →

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Solid Starts: Baby First Foods trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

CITB Op/Spec HS&E test App Store page →Solid Starts: Baby First Foods App Store page →

Related comparisons

Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Official Dvsa Theory Test Kit iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Driving Theory Test 4 in 1 Kit iOSCitb Map Hs E Test V10 iOS vs Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOSAnkimobile Flashcards iOS vs Citb Op Spec Hs E Test iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs Official Life in the Uk Test iOSCitb Op Spec Hs E Test iOS vs The Official Dvsa Highway Code iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Solid Starts: Baby First Foods? v
Solid Starts: Baby First Foods earns about $120.2K per month, while CITB Op/Spec HS&E test earns about $112. That is a 1073.2× revenue gap (~$120.1K more per month for Solid Starts: Baby First Foods). Annual revenue: CITB Op/Spec HS&E test ≈ $1.3K/year, Solid Starts: Baby First Foods ≈ $1.44M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Solid Starts: Baby First Foods? v
Solid Starts: Baby First Foods leads with about 3.7M estimated downloads vs 600 for CITB Op/Spec HS&E test - a 6212.1× gap. CITB Op/Spec HS&E test's App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Solid Starts: Baby First Foods's App Store downloads are estimated from 34K ratings.
Are CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and Solid Starts: Baby First Foods in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and Solid Starts: Baby First Foods offer? v
CITB Op/Spec HS&E test: no IAP detected on the public listing. Solid Starts: Baby First Foods: IAP range 8 tiers detected. CITB Op/Spec HS&E test runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Solid Starts: Baby First Foods runs "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Solid Starts: Baby First Foods? v
CITB Op/Spec HS&E test edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: CITB Op/Spec HS&E test 12 ratings, Solid Starts: Baby First Foods 34K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CITB Op/Spec HS&E test vs Solid Starts: Baby First Foods revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $112 for CITB Op/Spec HS&E test and $120.2K for Solid Starts: Baby First Foods are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CITB Op/Spec HS&E test or Solid Starts: Baby First Foods to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.