Classic Sudoku. vs The Coolest Chess 3D
Classic Sudoku.
SomePuzzle.com
Google Play
$58/mo
~$692/yr · 34K installs
VS
The Coolest Chess 3D
Snowball Games Studio
Google Play
$9/mo
~$106/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Classic Sudoku. wins
+544% vs other
Installs winner
Classic Sudoku. wins
+2135% vs other
MAU winner
Classic Sudoku. wins
+2159% vs other
Rating winner
The Coolest Chess 3D wins
+180% vs other
Why Classic Sudoku. is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Classic Sudoku. earns roughly 6× more per month than The Coolest Chess 3D - $58 vs $9.
- Bigger install base. Classic Sudoku. has ~34K lifetime installs vs The Coolest Chess 3D's ~2K - 22.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Classic Sudoku. report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$58
◀
$9
Annual revenue (est.)
$692
◀
$106
Lifetime installs (est.)
34K
◀
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
◀
141.188
App Store rating
-
▶
1.80★
Total ratings
0
▶
19
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Puzzle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 16, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Board
- Price
- USD0.49
- Released
- May 13, 2024
- Last updated
- Oct 9, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 0.09
- Languages
- -
Classic Sudoku. trajectory
The Coolest Chess 3D trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Classic Sudoku. or The Coolest Chess 3D? v
Classic Sudoku. earns about $58 per month, while The Coolest Chess 3D earns about $9. That is a 6.4× revenue gap (~$49 more per month for Classic Sudoku.). Annual revenue: Classic Sudoku. ≈ $692/year, The Coolest Chess 3D ≈ $106/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Classic Sudoku. or The Coolest Chess 3D? v
Classic Sudoku. leads with about 34K estimated downloads vs 2K for The Coolest Chess 3D - a 22.3× gap. Classic Sudoku. reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. The Coolest Chess 3D reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Classic Sudoku. and The Coolest Chess 3D in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
No - Classic Sudoku. is in Puzzle and The Coolest Chess 3D is in Board. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: Classic Sudoku. from puzzle monetization patterns, The Coolest Chess 3D from board.
Do Classic Sudoku. and The Coolest Chess 3D have in-app purchases? v
Classic Sudoku. does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. The Coolest Chess 3D does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Classic Sudoku. runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)", The Coolest Chess 3D runs "Paid app ($0.49)".
Which has better ratings, Classic Sudoku. or The Coolest Chess 3D? v
The Coolest Chess 3D edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 1.8 stars). Rating volume: Classic Sudoku. 0 ratings, The Coolest Chess 3D 5 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Classic Sudoku. vs The Coolest Chess 3D revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $58 for Classic Sudoku. and $9 for The Coolest Chess 3D are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Puzzle / Board) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Classic Sudoku. or The Coolest Chess 3D to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
