Claude by Anthropic vs HP
Claude by Anthropic
Anthropic PBC
Google Play
$9.22M/mo
~$110.58M/yr · 29.8M installs
VS
HP
HP Inc.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 153.9M installs
Revenue winner
Claude by Anthropic wins
+921524900% vs other
Installs winner
HP wins
+416% vs other
MAU winner
HP wins
+12% vs other
Rating winner
Claude by Anthropic wins
+11% vs other
Why Claude by Anthropic is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Claude by Anthropic earns roughly 9215249× more per month than HP - $9.22M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Claude by Anthropic runs a $70.71/mo subscription that compounds; HP relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Claude by Anthropic sits at 4.53★ vs 4.09★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Claude by Anthropic report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Claude by Anthropic
vs
HP
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$9.22M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$110.58M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
29.8M
▶
153.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.5M
▶
6.2M
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
4.09★
Total ratings
429K
▶
894K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$70.71
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 11, 2024
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.260430.10
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 21, 2012
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 26.1.2.6449
- Languages
- -
Claude by Anthropic trajectory
HP trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Claude by Anthropic or HP? v
Claude by Anthropic earns about $9.22M per month, while HP earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$9.22M more per month for Claude by Anthropic). Annual revenue: Claude by Anthropic ≈ $110.58M/year, HP ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Claude by Anthropic or HP? v
HP leads with about 153.9M estimated downloads vs 29.8M for Claude by Anthropic - a 5.2× gap. Claude by Anthropic reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. HP reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Claude by Anthropic and HP in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Claude by Anthropic and HP offer? v
Claude by Anthropic: IAP range $20.00 - $250.00 per item. HP: no IAP detected on the public listing. Claude by Anthropic runs a "Subscription (~$70.71/mo, ai)" monetization model; HP runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Claude by Anthropic or HP? v
Claude by Anthropic edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Claude by Anthropic 10K ratings, HP 35K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Claude by Anthropic vs HP revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $9.22M for Claude by Anthropic and $0 for HP are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Claude by Anthropic or HP to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.