Clock vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Clock
Egert
Google Play
$15.7K/mo
~$188.2K/yr · 6.1M installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$134/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
Clock wins
+11601% vs other
Installs winner
Clock wins
+86450% vs other
MAU winner
Clock wins
+38847% vs other
Rating winner
Clock wins
+31% vs other
Why Clock is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Clock earns roughly 117× more per month than NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - $15.7K vs $134.
- Subscription model. Clock runs a $2.11/mo subscription that compounds; NXV43 Elegant Watch Face relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Clock has ~6.1M lifetime installs vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face's ~7K - 865.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Clock sits at 3.38★ vs 2.58★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$15.7K
◀
$134
Annual revenue (est.)
$188.2K
◀
$1.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
6.1M
◀
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
273K
◀
699.7
App Store rating
3.38★
◀
2.58★
Total ratings
13K
◀
54
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.11
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2015
- Last updated
- Oct 28, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Clock trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Clock or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Clock earns about $15.7K per month, while NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $134. That is a 117.0× revenue gap (~$15.5K more per month for Clock). Annual revenue: Clock ≈ $188.2K/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Clock or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Clock leads with about 6.1M estimated downloads vs 7K for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - a 865.5× gap. Clock reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Clock and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Clock and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face offer? v
Clock: IAP range $0.99 - $4.49 per item. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face: no IAP detected on the public listing. Clock runs a "Subscription (~$2.11/mo)" monetization model; NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Clock or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Clock edges ahead with ★ 3.4 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Clock 437 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Clock vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $15.7K for Clock and $134 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Clock or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
