Coating Inspector vs Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects

Coating Inspector earns about $91 per month, while Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects earns about $56. That is a 1.6× revenue gap (~$35 more per month for Coating Inspector). Annual revenue: Coating Inspector ≈ $1.1K/year, Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects ≈ $670/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Coating Inspector leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 62 for Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects - a 29.2× gap. Coating Inspector reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects reports 50+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Business category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Coating Inspector: IAP range $18.99 - $28.99 per item. Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects: no IAP detected on the public listing. Coating Inspector runs a "Subscription (~$23.46/mo)" monetization model; Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects runs "Paid app ($74.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $91 for Coating Inspector and $56 for Fitzs Atlas of Coating Defects are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Business) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.