Cococam vs OSLink

Cococam

FANGLIN TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) CO., LIMITED
App Store
$28/mo
~$341/yr · 1K installs
VS

OSLink

Guangzhou Wujie Jiyuan Technology Co., Ltd.
App Store
$52/mo
~$619/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner OSLink wins +86% vs other
Installs winner OSLink wins +52% vs other
MAU winner OSLink wins +38% vs other
Rating winner Cococam wins +41% vs other

Why OSLink is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. OSLink earns roughly 2× more per month than Cococam - $52 vs $28.
  2. Aggressive pricing. OSLink undercuts at $0.99/mo vs $3.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. OSLink has ~2K lifetime installs vs Cococam's ~1K - 1.5× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full OSLink report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cococam
vs
OSLink
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$28
$52
Annual revenue (est.)
$341
$619
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
146.25
201.4
App Store rating
4.60★
3.27★
Total ratings
25
38
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
$0.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
7 tiers

Cococam

FANGLIN TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) CO., LIMITED
App Store
Category
Utilities
Price
Free
Released
Mar 24, 2022
Last updated
Jun 23, 2026
File size
273.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
6.1.1
Languages
Arabic, Czech, Dutch, English, French, German +11 more
View full Cococam report →

OSLink

Guangzhou Wujie Jiyuan Technology Co., Ltd.
App Store
Category
Utilities
Price
Free
Released
Jan 10, 2023
Last updated
Jun 18, 2026
File size
213.1 MB
Content rating
9+
Version
1.3.27
Languages
English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Thai, Chinese +1 more
View full OSLink report →

Cococam trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

OSLink trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cococam or OSLink? v
OSLink earns about $52 per month, while Cococam earns about $28. That is a 1.9× revenue gap (~$24 more per month for OSLink). Annual revenue: Cococam ≈ $341/year, OSLink ≈ $619/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cococam or OSLink? v
OSLink leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 1K for Cococam - a 1.5× gap. Cococam's App Store downloads are estimated from 25 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. OSLink's App Store downloads are estimated from 37 ratings.
Are Cococam and OSLink in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cococam and OSLink offer? v
Cococam: IAP range 10 tiers detected. OSLink: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Cococam runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; OSLink runs "Subscription (~$7.92/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cococam or OSLink? v
Cococam edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.3 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Cococam 25 ratings, OSLink 37 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cococam vs OSLink revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $28 for Cococam and $52 for OSLink are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cococam or OSLink to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.