Coeliac Australia vs Fitbit
Coeliac Australia
Coeliac Australia
Google Play
$1.6K/mo
~$18.8K/yr · 13K installs
VS
Fitbit
Google LLC
Google Play
$4.66M/mo
~$55.95M/yr · 253.3M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit wins
+297466% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit wins
+1966018% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit wins
+226760% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit wins
+415% vs other
Why Fitbit is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit earns roughly 2976× more per month than Coeliac Australia - $4.66M vs $1.6K.
- Subscription model. Fitbit runs a $28.27/mo subscription that compounds; Coeliac Australia relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit has ~253.3M lifetime installs vs Coeliac Australia's ~13K - 19661.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit sits at 4.15★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Coeliac Australia
vs
Fitbit
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.6K
▶
$4.66M
Annual revenue (est.)
$18.8K
▶
$55.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
13K
▶
253.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
▶
6.1M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.15★
Total ratings
0
▶
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD10.14
- Released
- Feb 2, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 11, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3.3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Coeliac Australia trajectory
Fitbit trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Coeliac Australia or Fitbit? v
Fitbit earns about $4.66M per month, while Coeliac Australia earns about $1.6K. That is a 2975.7× revenue gap (~$4.66M more per month for Fitbit). Annual revenue: Coeliac Australia ≈ $18.8K/year, Fitbit ≈ $55.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Coeliac Australia or Fitbit? v
Fitbit leads with about 253.3M estimated downloads vs 13K for Coeliac Australia - a 19661.2× gap. Coeliac Australia reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Fitbit reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Coeliac Australia and Fitbit in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Coeliac Australia and Fitbit offer? v
Coeliac Australia: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitbit: IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Coeliac Australia runs a "Paid app ($10.14)" monetization model; Fitbit runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo, wellness)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Coeliac Australia or Fitbit? v
Fitbit edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.1 stars). Rating volume: Coeliac Australia 0 ratings, Fitbit 245K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Coeliac Australia vs Fitbit revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.6K for Coeliac Australia and $4.66M for Fitbit are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Coeliac Australia or Fitbit to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.