Coke B2B vs Wine Maps
Coke B2B
Coca-Cola Al Ahlia Beverages Company LLC
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 700 installs
VS
Wine Maps
Jonathan Lord
App Store
$143/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 5K installs
Revenue winner
Wine Maps wins
+14300% vs other
Installs winner
Wine Maps wins
+671% vs other
MAU winner
Wine Maps wins
+729% vs other
Rating winner
Wine Maps wins
+168% vs other
Why Wine Maps is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Wine Maps earns roughly 143× more per month than Coke B2B - $143 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Wine Maps runs a $21.68/mo subscription that compounds; Coke B2B relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Wine Maps has ~5K lifetime installs vs Coke B2B's ~700 - 7.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Wine Maps sits at 4.59★ vs 1.71★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Wine Maps report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Coke B2B
vs
Wine Maps
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$143
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
700
▶
5K
Monthly active users (est.)?
65.1
▶
540
App Store rating
1.71★
▶
4.59★
Total ratings
14
▶
108
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 25, 2019
- Last updated
- Sep 22, 2025
- File size
- 55.1 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 12.6.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Aug 28, 2012
- Last updated
- Dec 16, 2024
- File size
- 48.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 5.2.2
- Languages
- English, French
Coke B2B trajectory
Wine Maps trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Coke B2B or Wine Maps? v
Wine Maps earns about $143 per month, while Coke B2B earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$143 more per month for Wine Maps). Annual revenue: Coke B2B ≈ $0/year, Wine Maps ≈ $1.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Coke B2B or Wine Maps? v
Wine Maps leads with about 5K estimated downloads vs 700 for Coke B2B - a 7.7× gap. Coke B2B's App Store downloads are estimated from 14 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Wine Maps's App Store downloads are estimated from 108 ratings.
Are Coke B2B and Wine Maps in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Coke B2B and Wine Maps offer? v
Coke B2B: no IAP detected on the public listing. Wine Maps: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Coke B2B runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Wine Maps runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Coke B2B or Wine Maps? v
Wine Maps edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 1.7 (gap of 2.9 stars). Rating volume: Coke B2B 14 ratings, Wine Maps 108 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Coke B2B vs Wine Maps revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Coke B2B and $143 for Wine Maps are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Coke B2B or Wine Maps to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.