Coles vs Target: Shop. Style. Save.
Coles
Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3.6M installs
VS
Target: Shop. Style. Save.
Target Corporation
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 43.4M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Target: Shop. Style. Save. wins
+1094% vs other
MAU winner
Target: Shop. Style. Save. wins
+691% vs other
Rating winner
Target: Shop. Style. Save. wins
+39% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Coles
vs
Target: Shop. Style. Save.
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.6M
▶
43.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
302K
▶
2.4M
App Store rating
3.50★
▶
4.87★
Total ratings
27K
▶
359K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 7, 2012
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.76.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 31, 2010
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2026.17.1
- Languages
- -
Coles trajectory
Target: Shop. Style. Save. trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Coles or Target: Shop. Style. Save.? v
Target: Shop. Style. Save. earns about $0 per month, while Coles earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Coles ≈ $0/year, Target: Shop. Style. Save. ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Coles or Target: Shop. Style. Save.? v
Target: Shop. Style. Save. leads with about 43.4M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for Coles - a 11.9× gap. Coles reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Target: Shop. Style. Save. reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Coles and Target: Shop. Style. Save. in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Shopping category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Coles and Target: Shop. Style. Save. have in-app purchases? v
Coles does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Target: Shop. Style. Save. does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Coles runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Target: Shop. Style. Save. runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Coles or Target: Shop. Style. Save.? v
Target: Shop. Style. Save. edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.4 stars). Rating volume: Coles 54 ratings, Target: Shop. Style. Save. 102K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Coles vs Target: Shop. Style. Save. revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Coles and $0 for Target: Shop. Style. Save. are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Shopping) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Coles or Target: Shop. Style. Save. to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.