congstar vs PDF Reader: View All PDFs

PDF Reader: View All PDFs earns about $17.8K per month, while congstar earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$17.8K more per month for PDF Reader: View All PDFs). Annual revenue: congstar ≈ $0/year, PDF Reader: View All PDFs ≈ $213.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

congstar leads with about 4.9M estimated downloads vs 1.1M for PDF Reader: View All PDFs - a 4.5× gap. congstar reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. PDF Reader: View All PDFs reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

congstar: no IAP detected on the public listing. PDF Reader: View All PDFs: IAP range $9.99 - $49.99 per item. congstar runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; PDF Reader: View All PDFs runs "Subscription (~$22.35/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

congstar edges ahead with ★ 4.1 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: congstar 42 ratings, PDF Reader: View All PDFs 38 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for congstar and $17.8K for PDF Reader: View All PDFs are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.