Coop TD: Together vs Ludo STAR
Coop TD: Together
SuperMagic
App Store
$2.0K/mo
~$24.1K/yr · 251K installs
VS
Ludo STAR
Gameberry Labs
App Store
$60.5K/mo
~$726.5K/yr · 15.1M installs
Revenue winner
Ludo STAR wins
+2911% vs other
Installs winner
Ludo STAR wins
+5921% vs other
MAU winner
Ludo STAR wins
+4356% vs other
Rating winner
Coop TD: Together wins
+4% vs other
Why Ludo STAR is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Ludo STAR earns roughly 30× more per month than Coop TD: Together - $60.5K vs $2.0K.
- Bigger install base. Ludo STAR has ~15.1M lifetime installs vs Coop TD: Together's ~251K - 60.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Ludo STAR report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.0K
▶
$60.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$24.1K
▶
$726.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
251K
▶
15.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
50K
▶
2.2M
App Store rating
4.71★
◀
4.51★
Total ratings
3K
▶
101K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$17.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
=
10 tiers
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 495.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.6.3
- Languages
- English, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Chinese +2 more
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 9, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 3, 2026
- File size
- 606.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.358.1
- Languages
- English
Coop TD: Together trajectory
Ludo STAR trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Coop TD: Together or Ludo STAR? v
Ludo STAR earns about $60.5K per month, while Coop TD: Together earns about $2.0K. That is a 30.1× revenue gap (~$58.5K more per month for Ludo STAR). Annual revenue: Coop TD: Together ≈ $24.1K/year, Ludo STAR ≈ $726.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Coop TD: Together or Ludo STAR? v
Ludo STAR leads with about 15.1M estimated downloads vs 251K for Coop TD: Together - a 60.2× gap. Coop TD: Together's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ludo STAR's App Store downloads are estimated from 101K ratings.
Are Coop TD: Together and Ludo STAR in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Coop TD: Together and Ludo STAR offer? v
Coop TD: Together: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Ludo STAR: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Coop TD: Together runs a "Free casual game · ads + tiny sub take (~$0.08/MAU)" monetization model; Ludo STAR runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Coop TD: Together or Ludo STAR? v
Coop TD: Together edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Coop TD: Together 3K ratings, Ludo STAR 101K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Coop TD: Together vs Ludo STAR revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.0K for Coop TD: Together and $60.5K for Ludo STAR are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Coop TD: Together or Ludo STAR to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
